Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:35:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs for no longer existing packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #292089,
regarding sylpheed-claws-pgpmime: sylpheed-claws segfault with
pgpmime/pgpinline plugins
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
292089: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292089
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sylpheed-claws-pgpmime
Version: 0.9.12b-1
Severity: normal
sylpheed claws segfaults reproducable when accessing PGP/inline PGP/mime
messages in the following order via IMAP (didn't have the chance to test
it with pop):
PGP/inline message --> PGP/mime message: segfault
PGP/mime message --> PGP/inline message: segfault
Doesn't segfault if accessing messages in this order:
PGP/mime --> PGP/mime --> PGP/inline message: no segfault
PGP/inline --> PGP/inline --> PGP/mime: no segfault
or
PGP/inline --> plaintext --> PGP/mime and vice versa.
This are the last line of the output when running with --debug (inline
--> mime access):
--------------------------snip-----------------------
imap.c:838:message 436 has been already cached.
imap.c:838:message 436 has been already cached.
pgpmime.c:137:Checking PGP/MIME signature
** CRITICAL **: file pgpmime.c: line 141 (pgpmime_check_signature): assertion
`fp != NULL' failed.
pgpmime.c:137:Checking PGP/MIME signature
** CRITICAL **: file pgpmime.c: line 141 (pgpmime_check_signature): assertion
`fp != NULL' failed.
Speicherzugriffsfehler
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-smp
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages sylpheed-claws-pgpmime depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii sylpheed-claws 0.9.12b-1 Bleeding edge version of the Sylph
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
Apologies if you receive this mail twice or more.
You're receiving this mail because you or somebody using your mail
address filed a bug on Debian BTS against sylpheed-claws or
sylpheed-claws-<something> package. If you didn't do you can ignore
the rest of the message ;-)
The sylpheed-claws and related packages has been dropped by upstream
and also removed from Debian from some time ago. They won't be
available in next stable release (lenny).
If you still use it *please* switch to the much improved claws-mail or
claws-mail-<something> package [0], which is the current
implementation.
NOTE: If the bug being closed still exist in claws-mail or
claws-mail-<something> please create a _new_ bug for claws-mail
package describing how to reproduce it. Current sources have been
greatly modified since sylpheed-claws stage, but it's important you
verify the bug doesn't happen with claws-mail and also file the bug
otherwise, so it can be fixed before next stable release.
WARNING: your bug may have been forwarded upstream, before creating
new bug reports check the status on upstream's bugzilla (URL is in the
bug page).
Thanks in advance and best regards,
[0] Supposing it exists now, because some have been removed too
because of licensing or other issues.
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«Q: What do agnostic, insomniac dyslexics do at night? A: Stay awake
and wonder if there's a dog.»
--- End Message ---
