Your message dated Sat, 18 Jun 2005 17:35:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Bugzilla #292725] Done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2005 04:10:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 20:10:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp6.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.25]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CujwT-0005WF-00; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:10:38 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0609.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2C313240010F;
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:10:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (AToulouse-152-1-69-86.w83-200.abo.wanadoo.fr
[83.200.169.86])
by mwinf0609.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E592A240010C;
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:10:05 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from buffy.cataldo.local (buffy [192.168.0.254])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDC0106FE9;
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:09:20 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Cataldo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bugzilla: Package does not seem to provide any upgrade facility
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:09:20 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: bugzilla
Severity: normal
I had bugzilla 2.14 from woody installed on one system and was trying
to do an upgrade to 2.18. So I tried to reproduce my production
environment which is buzzilla from woody plus some packages from
testing. After that I tried to install your 2.18 packages and was
pretty disapointed : it only asked me if I wanted an automatic or
manual install, while I wanted an upgrade of my existing setup.
I chose manual and pointed it to my 2.14 database. It broke
(checksetup failed) and to suceed I add to touch a file in the
templace dir, comment one function (the one with the 3 finds (I'm not
sitting in front of the system). The posting succeeded after that. My
bugzilla 2.18 was running. I was working, but when I ran a sanity
check inside bugzilla it pointed out lots of problem. So I've got
bugzilla 2.18 working on debian with your packages, but I fear
something will break later and I hesitate to put debian bugzilla 2.18
into production.
Did I do something wrong by choosing manual install, or is the upgrade
from the woody version not working ?
I undestand how hard maintaining a package like bugzilla can be, so
please keep up your good work.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages bugzilla depends on:
ii apache2-mpm-worker [httpd] 2.0.52-3 High speed threaded model for Apac
ii debconf 1.4.42 Debian configuration management sy
ii libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii libdbd-mysql-perl 2.9003-3 A Perl5 database interface to the
ii libtemplate-perl 2.14-1 template processing system written
ii libtimedate-perl 1.1600-4 Time and date functions for Perl
ii postfix [mail-transport-agent 2.1.5-5 A high-performance mail transport
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 292725-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2005 15:36:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 18 08:36:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.sukria.net [81.56.73.92]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjfMy-0003aC-00; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:36:28 -0700
Received: by www.sukria.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CD0DA21A; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 17:35:44 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 17:35:43 +0200
From: Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugzilla #292725] Done
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.23-chronos (i686)
X-Uptime: 17:33:35 up 122 days, 7:35, 1 user, load average: 0.24, 0.21, 0.13
X-PGP-ID: 1EE5DD34
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
The upgrade facility is now provided for a while (2.18-5).
The conffiles are now handle with care and you should be able to upgrade
your woody package.
Feel free to reopen the bug if not.
Regards.
--=20
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.sukria.net
=AB Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. =BB=20
Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
