Your message dated Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:14:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#351234: #351234 samba: SIGBUS on sparc since upgrading 
to 3.0.21a-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #351234,
regarding samba: SIGBUS on sparc since upgrading to 3.0.21a-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
351234: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=351234
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.21a-1
Severity: normal

I did an upgrade yesterday, and since then I'm being bombarded with
"Segfault in Samba" email messages.

>From smbd.log:

[2006/02/03 12:25:51, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(666)
  jop (192.168.170.196) connect to service data initially as user gpsshop 
(uid=1015, gid=100) (pid 24888)
[2006/02/03 12:26:04, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(369)
  gpsshop opened file firmware/Quest2/Quest2_250.exe read=Yes write=No 
(numopen= 2)
[2006/02/03 12:26:04, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(281)
  gpsshop closed file firmware/Quest2/Quest2_250.exe (numopen=1) 
[2006/02/03 12:26:04, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(369)
  gpsshop opened file firmware/Quest2/Quest2_250.exe read=Yes write=No 
(numopen= 2)
[2006/02/03 12:26:06, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
  ===============================================================
[2006/02/03 12:26:06, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37)
  INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 10 in pid 24888 (3.0.21a-Debian)
  Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba3-HOWTO
[2006/02/03 12:26:06, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)
  
  From: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf
[2006/02/03 12:26:06, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40)
  ===============================================================
[2006/02/03 12:26:06, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1544)
  smb_panic(): calling panic action [/usr/share/samba/panic-action 24888]
[2006/02/03 12:26:06, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1552)
  smb_panic(): action returned status 0
[2006/02/03 12:26:06, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1554)
  PANIC: internal error
[2006/02/03 12:26:06, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1562)
  BACKTRACE: 0 stack frames:

Note that the email subject is wrong: it's not a SIGSEGV, it's a SIGBUS.
These are generally due to unaligned accesses to memory (e.g. accessing
a 32-bit integer from an address where (address % 4) != 0 ).

On sparc, unfortunately, I don't know how to track these down :-(
I'll try to reproduce it on an alpha (the kernel there is helpful enough
to report such accesses and to fix them up, although there's a
significant speed penalty).

In the meantime I've downgraded to 3.0.14a-sarge1; up to now no
problems.


Paul Slootman


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.24-6

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 02:10:51PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Fri 15 Aug 2008, Noèl Köthe wrote:

> > you reported http://bugs.debian.org/351234 some time ago. Do you still
> > can reproduce this problem with samba 3.2.0 in lenny/sid?

> The system can't easily be upgraded to lenny at the moment (it's slated
> to be replaced completely soon), so I can't vouch for samba 3.2.0.
> However, I _can_ report that 3.0.24-6etch4 doesn't appear to have any
> problems, so as far as I'm concerned this bug report can be closed.

> Sorry about not thinking of following up on this earlier; I had
> downgraded from that bad 3.0.21a-1 version, and on a subsequent
> dist-upgrade the current version must have been installed without me
> thinking about that bad version.

Thanks for the follow-up!  Marking as closed for etch and lenny.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to