Your message dated Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:08:59 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#495955: IWBNI package number was interpreted as such
has caused the Debian Bug report #495955,
regarding IWBNI package number was interpreted as such
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
495955: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495955
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
If you use firefox's keyword seach (e.g. linking "db" to
bugs.debian.org) you currently need to link two - one for searching by
package name, one for by bug number.
It would be nice if searching for bugs in the package "123424" (or
#123424") looked for that as a bug number instead.
Or maybe it's just me :-)
Adrian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> If you use firefox's keyword seach (e.g. linking "db" to
> bugs.debian.org) you currently need to link two - one for searching
> by package name, one for by bug number.
You don't; just use http://bugs.debian.org/12345 or
http://bugs.debian.org/foopkg
Don Armstrong
--
She was alot like starbucks.
IE, generic and expensive.
-- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/batch3.htm
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--- End Message ---
