Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:55:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#495849: package deviates from standard
mail-transport-agent dependency.
has caused the Debian Bug report #495849,
regarding package deviates from standard mail-transport-agent dependency.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
495849: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495849
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ilohamail
Severity: normal
Hello!
Your packag depends on postfix | mail-transport-agent. Exim (v4) is generally
considered the default mta in Debian and is also the package providing
mail-transport-agent which has the highest priority.
Is there any particular reason why your package needs to deviate from
which mta is pulled in by default? If not, could you please consider
streamlining your package with the rest so we have a uniform behaviour in
debian?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (300, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 11483 March 1977, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Your packag depends on postfix | mail-transport-agent. Exim (v4) is generally
> considered the default mta in Debian and is also the package providing
> mail-transport-agent which has the highest priority.
> Is there any particular reason why your package needs to deviate from
> which mta is pulled in by default? If not, could you please consider
> streamlining your package with the rest so we have a uniform behaviour in
> debian?
No, this bug is
a.) a mass bug filing withuot any consensus (not even trying to get one)
b.) plain wrong
--
bye, Joerg
dvdbackup (0.1.1-7) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* The wiki-wacky-oaxtepec release
--- End Message ---
