Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:01:24 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#263250: debsums seems to miss dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2004 14:07:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 03 07:07:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 80-28-162-134.adsl.nuria.telefonica-data.net (permeke) 
[80.28.162.134] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BrzxG-0004w0-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 07:07:50 -0700
Received: from eric by permeke with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Brzcm-0000Ag-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 15:46:40 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debsums seems to miss dependencies
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 15:46:34 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: debsums
Version: 2.0.11
Severity: normal


After dpkg -i debsums*deb I get this error:

Can't locate Digest/MD5.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl 
/usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.3 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.3 /usr/lib/perl5 
/usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl 
.) at /usr/bin/debsums line 15.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/debsums line 15.


Does debsums lacks a Depends: field ?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: LANG=es_ES, LC_CTYPE=es_ES (ignored: LC_ALL set to es_ES)

Versions of packages debsums depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.4.25     Debian configuration management sy
ii  perl                          5.8.3-3    Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- debconf information excluded


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263250-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2005 11:01:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 04:01:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from londo.c47.org [198.142.1.20] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DkgVS-0001pi-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:01:26 -0700
Received: from bod by londo.c47.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1DkgVQ-0002yH-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:01:24 +1000
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:01:24 +1000
From: Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#263250: debsums seems to miss dependencies
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Unreproducable, no follow-up.  Closing.

--bod


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to