Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:13:52 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315331: "zip warning: No such device or address" does not 
specify pathname
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 2005 00:00:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 17:00:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dksew-0007yi-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:00:02 -0700
Received: from ip058.subnet65.gci-net.com ([127.0.0.1]) [216.183.65.58] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dksev-0007jk-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:00:01 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: "zip warning: No such device or address" does not specify pathname
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:00:00 -0700
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        NO_REAL_NAME,OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: zip
Version: 2.31-1
Severity: normal


zip is an excellent program and i want it to work as well as cpio.

i pipe pathnames to it.

the error message should be more informative.

thanks.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11--from-2.6.9-proc-config-and-menuconfig
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages zip depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf-show failed

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 315331-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 2005 22:17:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 22 15:17:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pizarro.unex.es [158.49.8.2] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DlDXO-0007Be-00; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:17:38 -0700
Received: from localhost (almendralejo.unex.es [158.49.8.199])
        by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP
        id 3D795A1C8F; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:17:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pizarro.unex.es ([158.49.8.2])
        by localhost (emilio [158.49.17.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 30267-08; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:19:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (guadiana.unex.es [158.49.17.23])
        by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP
        id 8AF7AA1C70; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:17:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cantor.unex.es ([158.49.18.105])
        by guadiana.unex.es with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1DlDXM-0008FL-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:17:36 +0200
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:13:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#315331: "zip warning: No such device or address" does not
 specify pathname
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at unex.es
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, t takahashi wrote:

> to reproduce, create a socket and pipe its pathname to zip -0qy - -@
> somefile.  i expected to see what file caused the error.  the
> message did not contain it.  that what you wanted?

Yes. This is not a bug. By using -q you are explicitly telling zip to
be quiet, so you can't really complain that it does not give all the
information.

Assuming that /dev/lop is a socket, compare the output of

echo /dev/log | zip -q - -@ > foo.zip

with the output of

echo /dev/log | zip - -@ > foo.zip


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to