Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:24:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line realtime-lsm has been removed from Debian, closing #337599
has caused the Debian Bug report #337599,
regarding linux-image-2.6.13-1-k7: Please make SECURITY_CAPABILITIES as module
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
337599: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=337599
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.13-1-k7
Version: 2.6.13-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: experimental
I want to compile realtime-lsm module in 2.6.13-1-k7 but
module-asisstant don't work:
# rgrep CAPABILITIES /boot/config-2.6.12-1-k7
CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=m
# rgrep CAPABILITIES /boot/config-2.6.13-1-k7
CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=y
In 2.6.12-1-k7 is module.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to es_ES.UTF-8)
Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.13-1-k7 depends on:
ii initrd-tools 0.1.82 tools to create initrd image for p
ii module-init-tools 3.2-pre9-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo
linux-image-2.6.13-1-k7 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8.7-3.1+rm
The realtime-lsm package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/499245 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
