Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:51:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: please package msynctool-0.19 for unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #485120,
regarding please package msynctool-0.19 for unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
485120: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=485120
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: msynctool
Severity: wishlist
it is all nice and great to have the 0.36 in experimental but an
msynctool that would actually have a chance to be shipped in lenny would
be nice. so how about msynctool 0.19 that works fine with opensync from
unstable?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-rc5-sonne (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages msynctool depends on:
ii libc6 2.7-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libglib2.0-0 2.16.3-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii libopensync1exp3 0.36-2 Synchronisation framework for emai
msynctool recommends no packages.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
multisync-tools contains the msynctool utility in testing/unstable.
I know the naming isn't great, but we can't change it anymore now.
cheers,
Michael
--- End Message ---
