Your message dated Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:53:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#316419: xfce4-utils: depending on
Essential packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2005 21:12:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 30 14:12:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Do6KV-0004Jv-00; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:12:15 -0700
Received: from tc218-187-20-133.dialup.dynamic.apol.com.tw
([218.187.20.133]:32786 helo=jidanni1)
by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.51 #0)
id 1Do6KT-000M4S-0Y by authid <jidanni> with plain
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 02:42:14 +0530
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
Subject: xfce4-utils: depending on Essential packages
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 0.6.90)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 04:29:28 +0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xfce4-utils
Severity: wishlist
xfce4-utils should not depend on debianutils, as per policy 3.5, I guess.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 316419-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2005 22:53:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 30 15:53:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from the.earth.li [193.201.200.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Do7up-0007ec-00; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:53:51 -0700
Received: from huggie by the.earth.li with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Do7ul-0000i5-4m; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:53:47 +0100
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:53:47 +0100
From: Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#316419: xfce4-utils: depending on Essential
packages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Black Cat Networks, http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/
X-Attribution: huggie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:29:28AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: xfce4-utils
> Severity: wishlist
> xfce4-utils should not depend on debianutils, as per policy 3.5, I guess.
This has been fixed in unstable since June 18th. Please include a
version number in future - I believe reportbug does this for you.
--
----------( "I think we're just out of Waldorfs" - Basil, )----------
----------( Fawlty Towers )----------
Simon ----( )---- Nomis
Htag.pl 0.0.22
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
