Your message dated Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:09:17 GMT
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line xpuyopuyo has been removed from Debian, closing #109332
has caused the Debian Bug report #109332,
regarding xpuyopuyo: incorrect manpage
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
109332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=109332
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xpuyopuyo
Version: 0.9.5-1
Severity: normal


Hi,

here is the problem:

$ man -k xpuyopuyo 
apropos: warning: This manpage agrees with version 0.9.5 of xpuyopuyo. contains 
a pointer loop
This manpage agrees with version 0.9.5 of xpuyopuyo. (6) [xpuyopuyo] - (unknown)
xpuyopuyo (6)        - A tetris-like puzzle game for X11.


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux irancy 2.4.8-686 #1 Sun Aug 12 11:18:19 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages xpuyopuyo depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.2.4-1    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2                    1.2.10-1.2 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2                     1.2.10-1   The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libmikmod2                    3.1.9-6    A portable sound library
ii  xlibs                         4.1.0-2    X Window System client libraries



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8-3+rm

The xpuyopuyo package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/509642 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to