Your message dated Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:28:56 GMT
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line opustex has been removed from Debian, closing #428784
has caused the Debian Bug report #428784,
regarding opustex: wrong dependencies for etch
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
428784: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=428784
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: opustex
Version: 0.84-5.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

opustex depends on tetex-bin and tetex-extra, but texlive is used since
etch.

Why is the old version still used instead of the latest (which is very
old too)?

Does the "licence" allow to patch OpusTeX?


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21.1test
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages opustex depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  tetex-base                  3.0.dfsg.3-5 Basic TeX input files of teTeX
ii  tetex-bin                   3.0-30       The teTeX programs

opustex recommends no packages.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.84-6.1+rm

The opustex package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/503521 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to