Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:20:37 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line No reply, closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #465267,
regarding Ndiswrapper fails on resume with kernels >= 2.6.23
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
465267: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465267
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ndiswrapper-source
Version: 1.52-1
Severity: normal

When suspending to disk with s2disk, ndiswrapper works fine (any version >=
1.49), resuming correctly, reassociating and letting dhcp renews the ip
address.

With kernels 2.6.23 and 2.6.24, it fails on resume: it reassociates with the
AP, but no traffic seems to be exchanged, dhcp keeps trying to acquire an
address but no reply received.

My card is a rt2500.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages ndiswrapper-source depends on:
ii  bzip2                         1.0.4-2    high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  debhelper                     5.0.61     helper programs for debian/rules
ii  module-assistant              0.10.11.0  tool to make module package creati

ndiswrapper-source recommends no packages.


-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Dear bug submitter,

because you did not response to my email sent on

    Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:24:03 +0200

in which I asked you whether you can reproduce this
bug using the current version of the package, I am
hereby closing this bug report.

Regards,
-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Free Software Developer
   Debian Developer  - Contributing Member of SPI
   Ubuntu Member     - Fellow of FSFE

Website: http://jak-linux.org/   XMPP: [email protected]
Debian:  http://www.debian.org/  SPI:  http://www.spi-inc.org/
Ubuntu:  http://www.ubuntu.com/  FSFE: http://www.fsfe.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to