Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:56:40 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#313485: module-assistant: arla-modules won't work
has caused the Debian Bug report #313485,
regarding module-assistant: arla-modules won't work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
313485: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=313485
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: module-assistant
Version: 0.9
Severity: normal
module-assistant offers arla-modules as a possibility to compile, but
that doesn't work. The arla-modules-source package just doesn't seem
to be set up for it. I don't know whether this should be raised as a
bug against the source package or not, but it's not useful to have it
in the module-assistant list currently.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages module-assistant depends on:
ii libtext-wrapi18n-perl 0.06-1 internationalized substitute of Te
ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Eduard Bloch <[email protected]> (14/06/2005):
> tags 313485 + unreproducible moreinfo
> thanks
That's been some years already.
> > module-assistant offers arla-modules as a possibility to compile, but
> > that doesn't work. The arla-modules-source package just doesn't seem
> > to be set up for it. I don't know whether this should be raised as a
> > bug against the source package or not, but it's not useful to have it
> > in the module-assistant list currently.
Given I can't find any arla* package in the archive currently, I'm
assuming this bug can't be reproduced at all. If there's still some
problematic arla module available anywhere, please let me know (by
reopening this bug, for example) and give more info.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
