Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:36:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298201: ejabberd dies again, now with a dump.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2005 17:32:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 05 09:32:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from silence.lateralis.org [81.56.5.120]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D7d96-0003XQ-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:32:56 -0800
Received: from laurent by silence.lateralis.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1D7d94-00030V-CF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:32:54 +0100
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:32:54 +0100
From: Laurent Fousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ejabberd: dies silently within two days
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Laurent Fousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ejabberd
Version: 0.7.5-7
Severity: important
Hi,
Since I installed ejabberd I've never seen it run for an extended
period of time. I didn't see anything particularly interesting in the
logs. If you have instructions on how I could track the problem I
would be glad to try them.
Although I didn't really measure the time it takes for ejabberd to
die, I think "two days" is rather generous.
Laurent.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-vt1211
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages ejabberd depends on:
ii erlang 1:10.b.1a-2 A real-time, concurrent and distri
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libexpat1 1.95.8-1 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii openssl 0.9.7e-3 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298201-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2005 16:33:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 12 09:33:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vwitme011.vkw.tu-dresden.de (vwitme011.vwi.vkw.tu-dresden.de)
[141.30.186.11]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DsNgz-0005r3-00; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:33:09 -0700
Received: from vwitme011.vwi.vkw.tu-dresden.de ([141.30.186.11]
helo=[127.0.0.1])
by vwitme011.vwi.vkw.tu-dresden.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1DsNgn-0007jw-18
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:32:57 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:36:20 +0200
From: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513
Debian/1.7.8-1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#298201: ejabberd dies again, now with a dump.
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Laurent Fousse schrieb:
> I couldn't reproduce the problem yet.
Closing the bug, please reopen if necessary.
Thanks,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
