Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:47:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314336: fixed in eep24c 0.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 19:20:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 12:20:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DidPw-00054x-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:19:16 -0700
Received: from hertz.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:6439:220:18ff:fe38:7815])
        by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
        (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DidPv-000368-50; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:19:15 +0200
Received: from aurel32 by hertz.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.51)
        id 1DidOD-0006ev-4A; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:17:29 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: eep24c(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: kfreebsd-i386 not in the architecture list
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:17:28 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: eep24c
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist


Hello,

The current version of eep24c fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD, 
because kfreebsd-i386 is not listed in the Architecture: field.

Could you please add kfreebsd-i386 to the list of the supported
architectures? 

You could do that automatically by running:
  sed -i -e "/^Architecture:/s/ i386/ i386 kfreebsd-i386/g" debian/control*

Thanks for your cooperation.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-10
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 314336-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2005 20:53:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 12 13:53:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DsRks-0007nQ-00; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:53:26 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DsRep-0001r6-00; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:47:11 -0400
From: Pedro Zorzenon Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#314336: fixed in eep24c 0.1.2-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:47:11 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: eep24c
Source-Version: 0.1.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
eep24c, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

eep24c_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/eep24c/eep24c_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
eep24c_0.1.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/eep24c/eep24c_0.1.2-1.dsc
eep24c_0.1.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/eep24c/eep24c_0.1.2-1_i386.deb
eep24c_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/eep24c/eep24c_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Pedro Zorzenon Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated eep24c package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:04:52 -0300
Source: eep24c
Binary: eep24c
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pedro Zorzenon Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Pedro Zorzenon Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 eep24c     - read and write serial I2C eeprom devices
Closes: 296495 314336
Changes: 
 eep24c (0.1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added kfreebsd-i386 to arch list. Thanks to Aurelien Jarno.
     (closes: #314336)
   * New Upstream Version: has option to increase clock delays, useful
     for long cables. Thanks to Roland Gruber. (closes: #296495)
Files: 
 0b85b2c5bb10012c8dcea9c0af73a033 592 electronics extra eep24c_0.1.2-1.dsc
 b8427a22469116ddb0041cb283ceb11a 87411 electronics extra 
eep24c_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz
 d70945b494f1b88eae0e74352d84fa99 2670 electronics extra eep24c_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
 7e3da2d54266a5b70e017f924be9237d 87062 electronics extra 
eep24c_0.1.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC1Ch3Ocl5Y3J0qgcRAuA4AKCUSpenwm+5EL7LxVnGV1jHfGIFTQCggGjB
5G5JR8TnSm5d/Z7RTm0nAGE=
=4hlo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to