Your message dated Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:05:48 GMT
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line unicorn has been removed from Debian, closing #446228
has caused the Debian Bug report #446228,
regarding unicorn: Integration into linux-modules-nonfree-2.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
446228: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446228
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: unicorn
Severity: wishlist
User: [email protected]
Usertags: conglomeration
Hi,
In short: Please consider letting your module be integrated into the
conglomeration package, so that the users can install prebuild module
binary packages for the Debian default kernel flavours.
In some more words, look at this:
http://blog.daniel-baumann.ch/2006/12/10#20061210_kernel-modules-packaging
The good thing about it: You only need to tell me 'Yes, please do so'
and I'll have a look at your module package in the next days and provide
a patch for it in case something needs to be adjusted.
Note that this is only possible, if your license terms of the non-free
module do allow autobuilding as well as binary distribution (which is
'normally' both the case, nevertheless, you need to check that; if you
need help finding it out, tell me and I'll have a look).
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [email protected]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.3-2+rm
The unicorn package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/512418 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
