Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:28:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#136970: gnupg: Fails to read secret key, so can't decrypt
anything
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2002 18:33:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 05 12:33:26 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [212.22.195.2] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16iJkc-0005Zl-00; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 12:33:26 -0600
Received: from (ming.empire.pick.ucam.org) [172.16.22.1] (mail)
by chiark.greenend.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1)
id 16iJka-0008Vq-00 (Debian); Tue, 05 Mar 2002 18:33:24 +0000
Received: from mcv21 by ming.empire.pick.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1
(Debian))
id 16iJkY-0005OS-00; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 18:33:22 +0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnupg: Fails to read secret key, so can't decrypt anything
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 18:33:22 +0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.0.6-2
Severity: grave
/tmp/feh.data is an ASCII-armoured gunpg-encrypted file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> gpg --output /tmp/feh.txt --decrypt /tmp/feh.data
gpg: Ohhhh jeeee: ... this is a bug (getkey.c:2234:lookup)
secmem usage: 1472/1472 bytes in 3/3 blocks of pool 1472/16384
Aborted
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> exit
Regards,
Matthew
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux ming 2.2.20 #1 Mon Feb 11 02:29:41 GMT 2002 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages gnupg depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libgdbmg1 1.7.3-27 GNU dbm database routines (runtime version).
ii makedev 2.3.1-57 Creates special device files in /dev.
ii zlib1g 1.1.3-19 compression library - runtime
devfsd Not installed or no info
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 136970-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2005 19:57:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 13 12:57:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from warp.os9.nl [145.99.250.222]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DsnMd-00011t-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:57:51 -0700
Received: from darwin.os9.nl (darwin.os9.nl [145.99.250.219])
by warp.os9.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E86E6A96
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:57:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by darwin.os9.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 63B1113923; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:57:49 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Bug#136970: gnupg: Fails to read secret key, so can't decrypt
anything
From: Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zJ3CSxszkWT47RIsPfLu"
Organization: Squirrelmail Development Team
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:28:20 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-zJ3CSxszkWT47RIsPfLu
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 30 Sep 2002 10:50:49 +0200, Thomas Hood writes:
> It appears that this problem was the result of a combination of
> a "bad" user configuration file and weak error reporting by gpg.
>=20
> The user has fixed his config, and the gpg code involved
> has "changed a lot", so it may be time to close this report.
> Agree?
Since no-one has objected to this in nearly three years, I think it's
safe to close this bug.
Thijs
--=-zJ3CSxszkWT47RIsPfLu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBC1WtUJdKMxZV9WM8RAmzNAJ955g8JfN+gostaU3I+WGbX5MeSSwCdHRt0
H7JwGa9iQPAewufeNsPwZB4=
=iPlB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-zJ3CSxszkWT47RIsPfLu--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
