Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:10:40 GMT
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line w3mmee has been removed from Debian, closing #405665
has caused the Debian Bug report #405665,
regarding w3mmee: Depends on
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
405665: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405665
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: w3mmee
Version: 0.3.p24.20-3
Severity: wishlist

w3mmee depends on libssl0.9.7, which is an oldlib. Since w3m depends on 
libssl0.9.8 instead, I'm guessing w3mmee 
could as well?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages w3mmee depends on:
ii  libc6                        2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgc1c2                     1:6.8-1     conservative garbage collector for
ii  libgpmg1                     1.19.6-23   General Purpose Mouse - shared lib
ii  libmoe1.5                    1.5.7-1     library to handle multiple octets 
ii  libncurses5                  5.5-5       Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libssl0.9.7                  0.9.7k-3    SSL shared libraries

Versions of packages w3mmee recommends:
ii  ca-certificates               20061027   Common CA Certificates PEM files

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.3.p24.20-3+rm

The w3mmee package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/517244 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to