Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:30:35 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line gtk+1.2 has been removed from Debian, closing #60310
has caused the Debian Bug report #60310,
regarding gtkprogressbar is too wide
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
60310: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=60310
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgtk1.2
Version: 1.2.7-1
Severity: wishlist
The minimum width of a horizontally-oriented GtkProgressBar is 150 pixels.
I'm trying to write a program that presents a tall, narrow window, and
150 pixels is just too wide. It'd be nice if the definition of
MIN_HORIZONTAL_BAR_WIDTH in gtk/gtkprogressbar.c was changed to a smaller
value (50-75 pixels would be good).
It'd be even nicer if this minimum could be overridden in a derived
widget without reimplementing half of the progress bar code, but
that's a bit harder to fix. :-)
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux donut 2.2.13 #1 Thu Dec 9 20:03:59 EST 1999 i586
Versions of packages libgtk1.2 depends on:
pn gconv-modules Not found.
ii libc6 2.1.3-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libc6 [gconv-modules] 2.1.3-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglib1.2 1.2.7-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii xlib6g 3.3.6-5 shared libraries required by X cli
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2.10-18.1+rm
The gtk+1.2 package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/520441 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
