Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 04:09:15 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2005 10:26:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 03:26:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DM1YJ-0001J5-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:26:27 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so434861wri
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
b=NYLyhAJSayNkLUulhgdpmMhsByvfxa40Ye9B5wIiCch7NYrJaU2JTAkAxgNgikhxuP00SzgtG4uQCZpoFfmJcZ/cwGOZ48z/qYnyw0rxanlyzeeakdtH8b1FJUgCp6p6V0Q08/klYm5A1kgE96nVeghTEIvTAiIM8ZXfKE+IJJg=
Received: by 10.54.33.68 with SMTP id g68mr788688wrg;
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.41.3 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:25:54 +0200
From: Axel Liljencrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Axel Liljencrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dpkg does not function under Fedora Core 3, patch provided
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.9.21
When trying to use dpkg together to build a debian package under
Fedora Core 3, dpkg exits with an error message saying "no gcc-lib
component". This is because dpkg expects gcclib to live in
/usr/share/gcc-lib/.../
but under Fedora Core 3, it lives under
/usr/share/gcc/.../
A suggest the following patch be applied to enquiry.c. It fixes this
issue by first checking for a /gcc-lib/ component in the gcclib path,
and if none exists, checks for a /gcc/ path. This should have _no_
impact on systems unaffected by this bug.
711a712,718
> if( !p ){
> p=3D strstr(vb.buf,"/gcc/");
> if (p) p+=3D 5;
> }
> else
> p+=3D 9;
>
713d719
< p+=3D 9;
If there is a need for transfering copyright even for such a trivial
patch, I willingly transfer copyright to the fsf, debian, Bill Gates
or whoever is applicable.
I am using Fedora Core 3.
If you think it doesn't matter if dpkg works under non-Debian systems,
please reconsider. I want my software to support Debian systems, but I
am not willing to let that dictate my choice of distribution. That is
why I am doing my best to make dpkg work under my computer. Thank you
for your time.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304610-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 01:09:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 16 18:09:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [62.49.129.34]
(qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dtxel-0007nX-00; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:09:23 -0700
Received: (qmail 30687 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2005 01:09:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by localhost with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 17 Jul 2005 01:09:21 -0000
Subject: Fixed
From: Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Axel Liljencrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-e84yP0VGaLJ87rtV4iO/"
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 04:09:15 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.5.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-e84yP0VGaLJ87rtV4iO/
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This was fixed in 1.13
Scott
--=20
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
--=-e84yP0VGaLJ87rtV4iO/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBC2a+7IexP3IStZ2wRAoC3AJ4n5ax+Cx9+1it+rG+WszG7tsmCLgCeKFM7
istuLeoRLuSPJvhFny7xHQk=
=zn0A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-e84yP0VGaLJ87rtV4iO/--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
