Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:52:13 +0200 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line sure, but the terrible seven years has caused the Debian Bug report #489671, regarding wx2.8-examples: bashism in /bin/sh script to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 489671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489671 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: wx2.8-examples Severity: important Version: 2.8.7.1-1 User: [email protected] Usertags: goal-dash Hello maintainer, While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package) check I've found your package containing one or more /bin/sh scripts making use of bashisms. checkbashisms' output: > possible bashism in ./usr/share/doc/wx2.8-examples/examples/wxPython/b line > 3 (sourced script with arguments): > . b $* Not using bash (or a Debian Policy conformant shell interpreter which does provide such an extra feature) as /bin/sh is likely to lead to errors or unexpected behaviours. Please be aware that although bash is currently the default /bin/sh there's a release goal for Lenny to make dash the default /bin/sh[1]. If you want more information about dash as /bin/sh, you can read: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/01/msg00189.html For more information please refer to the Debian Policy section 10.4 supporting this argument at: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-scripts Hints about how to fix bashisms: Sometimes these bugs are already fixed in Ubuntu, look at the PTS. If not already fixed you can read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh [1]http://release.debian.org/lenny/goals.txt Thank you, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Rson of the man whose ostracism is demanded for no fault of his own, but only because God made him black. The Presbyterian Church (North) deserves special mention for having, in the last General Assembly rejected a compromise that approved "the policy of separate churches, presbyteries and synods." The prize was nothing less than the ultimate reunion of the Northern and Southern branches of that great Church. The leaders in the Church and in the Assembly were committed to it and warmly advocated it, but when the test vote came, it was rejected by an overwhelming majority! _God grant that when the test comes for the Congregationalists they may show as much back-bone!_ The present stage of the controversy finds the Methodists, Baptists and Presbyterians still divided, with little prospect of reunion. The Episcopalians in South Carolina have surrendered on a compromise that permits the one colored minister in the Convention to remain in it, but utterly forbids the admission of any others. THE CONGREGATIONALISTS IN GEORGIA. The Congregationalists are considering the question practically, but with a division of sentiment. Some stand firmly against all race distinctions, while others are disposed to compromise on a plan that keeps the two organizations in Georgia still separated by the color-line, but that provides for the appointment of a few delegates from each, t<<inline: insolubilize.jpg>>
--- End Message ---
