Your message dated Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:46:45 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug #546310 RM: sugar-web-activity-0.84 -- ROM; only in NEW,
obsoleted by sugar-browse-activity-0.84 also in NEW
has caused the Debian Bug report #546310,
regarding RM: sugar-web-activity-0.84 -- ROM; only in NEW, obsoleted by
sugar-browse-activity-0.84 also in NEW
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
546310: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546310
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Yesterday I renamed the package sugar-web-activity to add trailing
branch name to both source and binary package.
I forgot to also rename the basename to reflect an upstream rename of
that project from "Web" to "Browse".
Currently these 2 packages are in NEW queue:
sugar-web-activity-0.84
sugar-browse-activity-0.84
Only the later one is wanted. Please reject/drop
sugar-web-activity-0.84.
Thanks, and sorry for the mess.
- Jonas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
closing this bug because sugar-web-activity-0.84 got rejected from NEW
as requested
Cheers,
Torsten
--- End Message ---
