Your message dated Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:21:34 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#546935: rrdtool: Criticality indication on graphs
has caused the Debian Bug report #546935,
regarding rrdtool: Criticality indication on graphs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
546935: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546935
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rrdtool
Version: 1.3.1-4
Severity: wishlist

It would be very useful to have some sort of visual indication, such as
color for "labelling" levels, for the importance or criticality of a
numerical level. Possibilities are:

1) Color of font used on the verical scale, i.e. the font could go from
green to yellow to red depending upon set thresholds for that graph.

2) A color band alongside the vertical scale indicating importance in a
manner similar to 1).

3) A transparent background shading of the body of the graph again similar 
to 1).

As mentioned in 1), the boundaries for the levels would be specified in
the graph configuration settings. The precision could be a simple 3 level scheme
as in 1), all the way to a totally configurable coloring specified by the
author of the graph depending upon how much time the developer has to 
implement the schemes.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-powerpc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages rrdtool depends on:
ii  libc6                  2.7-18            GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libfontconfig1         2.6.0-3           generic font configuration library
ii  libpixman-1-0          0.10.0-2          pixel-manipulation library for X a
ii  libpng12-0             1.2.27-2+lenny2   PNG library - runtime
ii  librrd4                1.3.1-4           Time-series data storage and displ
ii  libx11-6               2:1.1.5-2         X11 client-side library
ii  libxrender1            1:0.9.4-2         X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  zlib1g                 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime

rrdtool recommends no packages.

Versions of packages rrdtool suggests:
pn  librrds-perl                  <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Jeff,

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:16:03PM -0400, Jeffrey B. Green wrote:
> Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:34:00PM -0400, Jeffrey B. Green wrote:
> >> Sebastian Harl wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:45:04AM -0400, Jeff Green wrote:
> >> [...snip...]
> >>>> 2) A color band alongside the vertical scale indicating importance in a
> >>>> manner similar to 1).
> >>> This might be possible using some hacks by displaying a color gradient
> >>> (search the web for instructions how to do so) at the left side of your
> >>> graph. However, that would be far from user-friendly.
> >>>
> >>> An upstream feature request for that has been marked "wontfix" with the
> >>> comment "neither code nor money provided" ([rrd#24]) :-/
> >>>
> >> [...snip...]
> >>> Have a look at the "Windvaan de drie delfzijlen" example at the
> >>> [rrdgallery]. Instead of drawing lines marking "windsterkte" (wind
> >>> speed, I suppose) you could also draw areas providing that kind of
> >>> information. Is that what you were thinking about?
> >>>
> >>> [rrdgallery] <http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/gallery/index.en.html>
> >> That graph could work. The use that I was thinking of was in conjunction
> >> with collectd. If the technique used for that graph is available, then I
> >> could then transfer this wishlist item to that group.
> > 
> > "that group" being the collectd maintainer (that'd be me ;-))?
> 
> I actually got that wrong. When I look at the graphs I think collectd
> and forget that they are generated via drraw. I seem to remember
> installing drraw separate, i.e. not as part of the debian packages.

All right. With this E-mail, I'm closing this bug now. If you think
there's anything else missing in RRDtool for that purpose, please feel
free to reopen it.

Cheers,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.         -- Benjamin Franklin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to