Your message dated Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318716: fixed in nbd 1:2.7.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 08:38:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 01:38:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d127189.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain)
[80.171.127.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Du4fG-0000sI-00; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 01:38:22 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1Du4fE-0003Fs-M0; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:38:20 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nbd: FTBFS (ppc64): Please support the ppc64 architecture
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:38:20 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: nbd
Version: 1:2.7.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
When building 'nbd' on ppc64/unstable,
I get the following error:
dh_shlibdeps -a
if [ `uname -s` = 'Linux' ]; then dh_gencontrol -a; else dh_gencontrol
-pnbd-server; fi
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture ppc64 does not appear in
package's list (alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sh3
sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc amd64)
dh_gencontrol: command returned error code 65280
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
With the attached patch 'nbd' can be compiled on ppc64.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/nbd-2.7.4/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/nbd-2.7.4/debian/control 2005-07-17 08:17:36.000000000
+0000
+++ ./debian/control 2005-07-17 08:17:22.000000000 +0000
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
but something else, like Sun's Network File System (NFS), or CODA.
Package: nbd-client
-Architecture: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sh3 sh3eb
sh4 sh4eb sparc amd64
+Architecture: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 sh3
sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc amd64
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, debconf
Description: the Network Block Device client
This package contains the client process for the Network Block
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 318716-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2005 00:53:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 02 17:53:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E07PU-00080h-00; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:47:04 -0700
From: Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318716: fixed in nbd 1:2.7.4-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:47:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: nbd
Source-Version: 1:2.7.4-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nbd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
nbd-client_2.7.4-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/n/nbd/nbd-client_2.7.4-2_powerpc.deb
nbd-server_2.7.4-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/n/nbd/nbd-server_2.7.4-2_powerpc.deb
nbd_2.7.4-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nbd/nbd_2.7.4-2.diff.gz
nbd_2.7.4-2.dsc
to pool/main/n/nbd/nbd_2.7.4-2.dsc
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated nbd package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 02:22:23 +0200
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-client nbd-server
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1:2.7.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
nbd-client - the Network Block Device client
nbd-server - the Network Block Device server
Closes: 315705 318716 318912
Changes:
nbd (1:2.7.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add alternate dependency on the virtual package debconf-2.0
* Add ppc64 to the list of build architectures for nbd-client;
Closes: #318716.
* Add Vietnamese translation. Thanks, Clytie Siddall; Closes: #315705.
* Add Czech translation. Thanks, Miroslav Kure; Closes: #318912.
* Standards-Version bump to 3.6.2. No changes applicable to nbd.
Files:
0358ac6f5af44d59a4d6ae297b7645df 570 admin optional nbd_2.7.4-2.dsc
215470814c53274cfc4f85d22ce232f3 38079 admin optional nbd_2.7.4-2.diff.gz
f931bcd835ba9e392bc34ed87b17e33a 33950 admin optional
nbd-server_2.7.4-2_powerpc.deb
3442b8f093c644af60191fd8ae42181e 24950 admin optional
nbd-client_2.7.4-2_powerpc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC8A59PfwsYq950p4RAhKIAKCdghp2M7gDueCVn0pWENJH/kiP/gCdFD+o
e7rDF2PrMGR79xeC4umRmdA=
=8CiT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
