Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:45:19 +0200
with message-id <1255189519.3139.11.ca...@hidalgo>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#526117: Bug#526117: Bug#526117: 
xfce4-panel: Wrong panel position with dual screen
has caused the Debian Bug report #526117,
regarding xfce4-panel: Wrong panel position with dual screen
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
526117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xfce4-panel
Version: 4.6.1-1
Severity: important

I have a dual screen using TwinView. I have an horizontal panel on top of only 
one screen. Position is set to Fixed position, Full width, top left, monitor 1 
(if I set it to 2, it's the same)

The problem is that the panel seems to be wider than the screen, but you only 
see a part of it. So you don't see the right part of the panel, even if there 
are applications, notification area...

This makes panel un-usable as it hides half of things it contains.

If I set panel position to Span Monitors, I see the end of the panel correctly. 
But I don't want the panel on both screens.

It worked nice with previous version of XFCE 4.4


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xfce4-panel depends on:
ii  exo-utils              0.3.101-1         Utility files for libexo
ii  libatk1.0-0            1.26.0-1          The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6                  2.9-7             GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2              1.8.6-2+b1        The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libexo-0.3-0           0.3.101-1         Library with extensions for Xfce
ii  libfontconfig1         2.6.0-3           generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6           2.3.9-4.1         FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libglib2.0-0           2.20.1-1          The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0            2.16.1-2          The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6                2:1.0.5-1         X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libpango1.0-0          1.24.0-3+b1       Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libsm6                 2:1.1.0-2         X11 Session Management library
ii  libstartup-notificatio 0.10-1            library for program launch feedbac
ii  libwnck22              2.24.2-2          Window Navigator Construction Kit 
ii  libx11-6               2:1.2.1-1         X11 client-side library
ii  libxfce4util4          4.6.1-1           Utility functions library for Xfce
ii  libxfcegui4-4          4.6.1-1           Basic GUI C functions for Xfce4
ii  zlib1g                 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-13 compression library - runtime

xfce4-panel recommends no packages.

xfce4-panel suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On sam, 2009-06-27 at 12:50 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On sam, 2009-06-27 at 12:46 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> > I still think there is something strange: The panel is able to detect
> > the right border of my screen as show in the attached screenshot: when
> > panel is configured in "normal width" mode, aligned on the right, and
> > there not too much elements in it, it is correctly aligned on the
> > right.
> > So why isn't it able to detect the right border if there are more
> > elements or in "full width" mode? 
> 
> What are the results in vesa mode?

Hmmh, no news is good news, I guess. Feel free to reopen with more info
if needed.

Cheers,

-- 
Yves-Alexis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to