Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:46:49 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#518742: fixed in binutils-avr 2.20-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #518742,
regarding binutils-avr: FTBFS: patching fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
518742: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518742
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: binutils-avr
Version: 2.18-4
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20090307 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp a.out unpack-stamp patch-stamp
> # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
> #-/usr/bin/make clean
> rm -rf src
> #rm binutils-2.18.tar.bz2
> dh_clean
> dpkg-source -b binutils-avr-2.18-4
> dpkg-source: warning: source directory 'binutils-avr-2.18-4' is not
> <sourcepackage>-<upstreamversion> 'binutils-avr-2.18'
> dpkg-source: info: using source format `1.0'
> dpkg-source: info: building binutils-avr in binutils-avr_2.18-4.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: info: building binutils-avr in binutils-avr_2.18-4.dsc
> debian/rules build
> tar xjf /usr/src/binutils/binutils-*.tar.bz2
> #tar xjf binutils-2.18.tar.bz2
> mv `ls -d binutils* | grep -v tar` src
> #mkdir build
> touch unpack-stamp
> cd src && for p in ../debian/patches/*.patch; do patch -p0 < $p; done
> patching file bfd/Makefile.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1576 (offset 596 lines).
> patching file binutils/size.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 36 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 69 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 84 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 241 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 251 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 262 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 270 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 302 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 311 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #10 succeeded at 327 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #11 succeeded at 359 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #12 succeeded at 412 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #13 succeeded at 771 (offset -1 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/doc/objcopy.1
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 193 with fuzz 2.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 807 (offset -2 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/Makefile.am
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 97 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 105 (offset -1 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/Makefile.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 133 (offset 4 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 421 (offset 3 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 429 (offset 3 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/bucomm.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 549 (offset 48 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/bucomm.h
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 57 (offset 3 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/budbg.h
> patching file binutils/debug.c
> patching file ./binutils/debug.h
> patching file ./binutils/objcopy.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 32 with fuzz 2.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 271 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 317 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 507 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 955 (offset 37 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 1056 (offset 37 lines).
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 2669 (offset 71 lines).
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 3371 (offset 70 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/rdcoff.c
> patching file ./binutils/wrcoff.c
> patching file ./bfd/Makefile.am
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 391 (offset 2 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1202 with fuzz 2 (offset 12 lines).
> patching file ./bfd/Makefile.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 462 (offset 4 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 645 (offset 6 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1786 with fuzz 2 (offset 16 lines).
> patching file ./bfd/coff-avr.c
> patching file ./bfd/coff-ext-avr.c
> patching file ./bfd/coffcode.h
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 1.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 1778 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1813 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 1939 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 2740 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 3543 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 3892 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 3970 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 4165 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #10 succeeded at 4544 (offset 9 lines).
> Hunk #11 succeeded at 4771 (offset 9 lines).
> patching file ./bfd/coffgen.c
> patching file ./bfd/coffswap.h
> patching file ./bfd/config.bfd
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 328 (offset 1 line).
> patching file ./bfd/configure
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 19626 (offset 592 lines).
> patching file ./bfd/configure.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 619 (offset 7 lines).
> patching file ./bfd/targets.c
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 884 (offset 6 lines).
> patching file ./include/coff/avr.h
> patching file ./include/coff/internal.h
> patching file ld/scripttempl/avr.sc
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr1.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr2.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr3.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr4.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr5.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr6.sh
> patching file ld/scripttempl/avr.sc
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file binutils/objdump.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 964.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file binutils/objdump.c.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 150.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 58.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 98.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 41.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 41.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 99.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 115.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 49.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 68.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 98.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 328.
> 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 103.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 123.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 131.
> 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 44.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 100.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 41.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 147.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 57.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 63.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 103.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 161.
> 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 44.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 60.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file include/opcode/avr.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 40.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/opcode/avr.h.rej
> patching file include/opcode/avr.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 34.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/opcode/avr.h.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 84.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file opcodes/avr-dis.c
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 65.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 180.
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 802 (offset -15 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 924 (offset -15 lines).
> 2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file include/opcode/avr.h
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 30 with fuzz 1.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 50 with fuzz 2 (offset -5 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 112 (offset 10 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 173 (offset 10 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 288 (offset 10 lines).
> patching file bfd/archures.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 357 with fuzz 2 (offset 5 lines).
> patching file bfd/cpu-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 86.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file bfd/cpu-avr.c.rej
> patching file include/elf/avr.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 35.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/elf/avr.h.rej
> patching file ld/Makefile.am
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 142 with fuzz 2 (offset 4 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 653 (offset 24 lines).
> patching file ld/Makefile.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 393 with fuzz 2 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 1485 (offset 30 lines).
> patching file ld/configure.tgt
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 107.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/configure.tgt.rej
> patching file ld/emultempl/avrelf.em
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega1.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega2.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega3.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega4.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega5.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega6.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega7.sh
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 172.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 60.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 172.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 60.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 174.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 60.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file include/opcode/avr.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 41.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/opcode/avr.h.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 116.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 45.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file include/opcode/avr.h
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file include/opcode/avr.h.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file bfd/elf32-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 2034.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file bfd/elf32-avr.c.rej
> make: *** [patch-stamp] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/03/07/binutils-avr_2.18-4_lsid32.buildlog
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [email protected] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [email protected] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils-avr
Source-Version: 2.20-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
binutils-avr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
binutils-avr_2.20-1.dsc
to main/b/binutils-avr/binutils-avr_2.20-1.dsc
binutils-avr_2.20-1.tar.gz
to main/b/binutils-avr/binutils-avr_2.20-1.tar.gz
binutils-avr_2.20-1_amd64.deb
to main/b/binutils-avr/binutils-avr_2.20-1_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hakan Ardo <[email protected]> (supplier of updated binutils-avr package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:37:05 +0100
Source: binutils-avr
Binary: binutils-avr
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.20-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hakan Ardo <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Hakan Ardo <[email protected]>
Description:
binutils-avr - Binary utilities supporting Atmel's AVR targets
Closes: 362270 518742
Changes:
binutils-avr (2.20-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (closes: #518742, #362270)
* Applied newsections (rev 1.2) and xmega (rev 1.3) patches from
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/avr-binutils/
Checksums-Sha1:
3f0bee1eda348fbab3d1f0fc5c67659f5032892f 896 binutils-avr_2.20-1.dsc
a8882f15842c8babecdbb0428cd26b769c87d92a 107523 binutils-avr_2.20-1.tar.gz
347af2c26e625b8a133ca4664479543e71d8d426 4894614 binutils-avr_2.20-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
6c82c5cae66dd06e739cbd764ec73e3051c4d7abbc203cbff752fdbe1a2b26b8 896
binutils-avr_2.20-1.dsc
1ecf35fc14d5dad459c838cd7bb033f6ff7135a46f86603a463765f3b8ace164 107523
binutils-avr_2.20-1.tar.gz
84ee20d2359b14602af5ce1e4a42e20cd8e6b06b3f9c4b14e59390bec2da439e 4894614
binutils-avr_2.20-1_amd64.deb
Files:
6157b0b87de822f2ea2830cdab5b790e 896 devel extra binutils-avr_2.20-1.dsc
f06b6de8c26c565b9930920cc3b56056 107523 devel extra binutils-avr_2.20-1.tar.gz
23ef7852fb2d1dff9563f8bf8dbda7ca 4894614 devel extra
binutils-avr_2.20-1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrsJ6AACgkQAbtddT3jfcA4JACgov3hXE+VcE4U5N0WMYWE50h0
v6QAn1HthoT2f55b3zxlS9WYJUjSOM24
=mLJA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
