Your message dated Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:37:59 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Is the dependency on libsnmp-session-perl _really_
required?
has caused the Debian Bug report #289471,
regarding Is the dependency on libsnmp-session-perl _really_ required?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
289471: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289471
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mrtg
Version: 2.10.13-1
Severity: important
When running cfgmaker with libsnmp-session-perl 0.94 installed, it
spits the following error:
SNMP_util version 0.97 required--this is only version 0.94 at
/usr/share/perl/5.8/Exporter/Heavy.pm line 107.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/MRTG_lib.pm line 20.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/cfgmaker line 44.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/cfgmaker line 44.
upgrading to latest libsnmp-session-perl fixes this problem. Currently
mrtg depends on
libsnmp-session-perl (>= 0.93)
Which is incorrect atlest for cfgmaker
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux watergate 2.6.0-test11 #2 Tue Dec 9 20:02:17 EET 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.ISO8859-1
Versions of packages mrtg depends on:
ii debconf 1.2.23 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libsnmp-session-perl 1.00-1 Perl support for accessing SNMP-aw
ii perl 5.8.3-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii perl-modules 5.8.3-3 Core Perl modules.
-- debconf information:
mrtg/own_user: true
* mrtg/conf_mods: false
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Sorry, I'm not going to patch this out, to the package will remain in
depends. If you strongly believe it has to be in a "low prio" field,
please bring this to upstream.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
