Your message dated Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:29:32 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#540556: ssss: should this package be removed?
has caused the Debian Bug report #540556,
regarding ssss: should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
540556: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=540556
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ssss
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: proposed-removal

Hi James,

While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:

 * No upload since 2006
 * Low popcon
 * Better (at least, more used) alternative available: libgfshare-bin

If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
just close this bug and do an upload also fixing the other issues.

If you agree that it should be removed, send the following commands to 
[email protected] (replace nnnnnn with this bug's number):

severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org
retitle nnnnnn RM: <packagename> -- RoM; <reasons> 
thanks

For more information, see
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt

Thank you,
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [email protected]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [email protected]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 04/12/09 at 00:36 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Hi,
> I happened to see this bug, and am the maintainer of libgfshare in Debian...
> I don't see any particular reason to remove ssss unless it develops RC bugs,

Me neither. The point of this process is to provide a public way where
we can discuss possible candidates for removals, and avoid mistakes.
This proved very successful from this package :-)

I was obviously a bit too quick at suggesting the removal of this
package. I'm closing that bug now.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [email protected]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [email protected]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to