Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line unregister_netdevice: waiting for ... to become free
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 10:08:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 02:08:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-out-02.utu.fi [130.232.202.172]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Fuq-0003WJ-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:08:17 -0800
Received: from alnitak.stiff.utu.fi (mintaka-dsl.utu.fi [130.232.36.179])
by smtp02.mess.utu.fi
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:06:12 +0200 (EET)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:06:12 +0200
From: Juha =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=E4ykk=E4?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-source-2.6.10: a third instance of unregister_netdevice:
waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = <integer>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: University of Turku
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-5
Severity: important
I am experiencing the same symptoms as bugs #291029, #290964 and #291940. This
time the device
is just an ordinary eth0 (happens to be a prism54) - no tunnels, bridges or
anything. I even
removed all IPv6- and tunneling support from the kernel (that's why my kernel
is not Debian's
own kernel-image - the .config is identical except swsusp is turned on and the
forementioned
parts off).
This happens almost every time there is a network connection established when I
try to ifdown
the interface or remove the pccard or unload the module. I say almost: it looks
like only ssh
connections and actively refreshed http-connections actually make this happen.
Perhaps those
queues' Recv-Q or Send'Q are non-empty? (A connection established means here
that netstat says
it's established.)
The problem sometimes goes away by terminating the offending process - if I can
find which one
it is. This does not happen every time, though.
Shutting down works fine, since the processes are terminated before ifdown is
run. The problem
is that using ACPI sleep states (swsusp, S3, hibernate etc) take ethernet
devices down first
and hang there - with the line in subject.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (999, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10+juhaj+v1.7
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.10 depends on:
ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii bzip2 1.0.2-5 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities
ii fileutils 5.2.1-2 The GNU file management utilities
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296721-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 10:30:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 03:30:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E3Wnx-0003Il-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:30:25 -0700
Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id C3ADF5C001; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:30:15 +0200
From: Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for ... to become free
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:54:41PM +0300, Jukka Suomela wrote:
> On Friday 12 August 2005 12:19, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > can you still reproduce this bug with newer linux kernel images,
> > like the linux image 2.6.12?
>
> If I remember right, I never saw this problem with 2.6.11 kernel images
> from Debian unstable. It just happened on 2.6.10.
>
> I am sorry I do not have the same network setup any more, so I cannot
> tell what would have happened with 2.6.12. Anyway, 2.6.12 works fine on
> my current system.
>
> Best regards,
> Jukka Suomela
thanks to all your feedback.
indeed the sent patch went in before 2.6.12.
closing therefor.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
