Your message dated Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:21:44 +0900
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#570739: imagej missing required
dependencies
has caused the Debian Bug report #570739,
regarding imagej missing required dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
570739: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570739
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: imagej
Version: 1.43b-1ubuntu1
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers karmic-updates
APT policy: (500, 'karmic-updates'), (500, 'karmic-security'), (500, 'karmic')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.6 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages imagej depends on:
ii default-jre [java2-r 1.6-30ubuntu5 Standard Java or Java compatible R
ii gcj-4.4-jre [java2-r 4.4.1-5ubuntu2 Java runtime environment using GIJ
ii gcj-jre [java2-runti 4:4.4.1-1ubuntu2 Java runtime environment using GIJ
ii openjdk-6-jre [java2 6b16-1.6.1-3ubuntu1 OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspo
imagej recommends no packages.
Versions of packages imagej suggests:
pn java2-compiler <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
Per email (included below) from Charles Plessy ([email protected]), I'm
creating this report so the 'imagej' dependencies are listed. The problem
I reported was "fixed" by installing "default-jre" and "gcj-jre", Charles'
speculation that tightening the dependencies may be the correct answer.
---
Le Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 06:16:19PM -0800, Bob McGowan a écrit :
> > Due to not properly generating a JAVA_HOME when the variable is not
> > defined in the user's environment.
> >
> > I happen to be running Kubuntu, so if I should be sending this to
> > someone else, let me know who.
> >
> > The error, when running 'imagej', unmodified, on the command line, is:
> >
> > Open other images in this ImageJ panel as follows:
> > imagej -p 1 <image1> [<image2> ... <imageN>]
> >
> > cat: /usr/share/imagej/jni/*: No such file or directory
> > /usr/bin/imagej: line 418: //bin/java: No such file or directory
Dear Bob,
I just tried on my computer and did not reproduce the problem. But there are
so
many variants of Java around, maybe the problem comes from that we are not
using the same combination of packages?
Do not hesitate to report your problem using the command-line tool
‘reporbug’. It
will conveniently append a list of packages installed on your system, on which
imagej depends. That will be very helpful.
Since you are using kubuntu, you will need to pass the option --bts=debian,
otherwise your report will go to Launchpad instead. Actually, there seems
to be a similar report in Launchapd already:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagej/+bug/471127
Maybe we only have to tighten the dependancies in imagej ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
---
Bob
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Le Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:43:45AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 09:47:50PM -0800, Bob McGowan wrote:
> > Package: imagej
> > Version: 1.43b-1ubuntu1
>
> Sorry, I can not reproduce this on a Debian system.
> I have seen similar problem at
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagej/+bug/471127
>
> Is there any reason that you report this problem to Debian when working
> with Ubuntu?
Hi Andreas and Bob,
I did not read the version numbers correctly and thought that Bob was using the
package version 1.43l-1, so I thought it would be relevant for Debian and asked
him to report the bug here. I just looked at 1.43b-1ubuntu1: it depends on gij |
java2-runtime, in contrary to 1.43l-1 which depends on openjdk-6-jre |
java2-runtime. Installing default-jre pulls openjdk-6-jre, which solves the
problem for 1.43b-1ubuntu1.
In conclusion, both bugs can be closed. Sorry for the noise.
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--- End Message ---
