Your message dated Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:17:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322716: fixed in devscripts 2.9.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2003 13:11:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 14 07:11:21 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.ilk.de [194.121.104.8]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AKdjN-0003Kh-00; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:11:21 -0600
Received: from fw1 (fw1.ilk.de [212.86.193.6])
by mail.ilk.de with SMTP id hAEDBKeF020525;
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:11:20 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /usr/bin/debchange: please consider adding --create option to dch
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:11:07 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.7.92.1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/debchange
Hi,
please consider adding an option to create a new debian/changelog file
for new packages. dch is the natural tool to look for such an option.
Greetings
Marc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux kes 2.4.22-kes #1 Tue Oct 7 07:49:10 UTC 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages devscripts depends on:
ii debianutils 2.6.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dpkg-dev 1.10.18 Package building tools for Debian
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii perl 5.8.2-1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 322716-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 16:20:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 17 09:20:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5Qb9-0002nd-00; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:17:03 -0700
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#322716: fixed in devscripts 2.9.5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:17:03 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: devscripts
Source-Version: 2.9.5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
devscripts, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
devscripts_2.9.5.dsc
to pool/main/d/devscripts/devscripts_2.9.5.dsc
devscripts_2.9.5.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/devscripts/devscripts_2.9.5.tar.gz
devscripts_2.9.5_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/devscripts/devscripts_2.9.5_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated devscripts package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:08:09 -0400
Source: devscripts
Binary: devscripts
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.9.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
devscripts - Scripts to make the life of a Debian Package maintainer easier
Closes: 220755 313323 316661 321684 321707 321798 321960 322716
Changes:
devscripts (2.9.5) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Joey Hess ]
* bts: Make block command accept "by" or "with" after the blocked bug,
but do not make either mandatory.
* debcommit: try to add support for svk
.
[ Julian Gilbey ]
* bts: fix clone command (Closes: #321798)
* debchange: add comment to manpage about building sponsored uploads
(Closes: #321960)
* debchange: introduce --create option: allows creation of changelogs /
NEWS files (Closes: #220755, #322716), and inform user about this
option if changelog / NEWS file is not found (Closes: #316661)
* debchange: allow option (--nomultimaint) to not use this
multi-maintainer changelog format
* debsign: fix noecho behaviour for interrupted gpg call (Closes:
#321684)
* uscan: --report actually reports useful information (Closes: #313323)
* wnpp-alert: RFA -> RFH (Closes: #321707)
.
[ Joey Hess ]
* bts: Deal with recent bts changes in html munging code.
Files:
c97de52a95aed6d194551d8a2c013dbd 683 devel optional devscripts_2.9.5.dsc
75400e766b3cbed47711c009889f3ef9 330686 devel optional devscripts_2.9.5.tar.gz
ff51ffbcfbbd710eac4e97427398f172 286608 devel optional
devscripts_2.9.5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDA2Fp2tp5zXiKP0wRAuUrAJ9zG9TFM2RcFmq7q5VypJK505+2cwCguzuX
5x5/MUayDEWA/4pv6R9CR0I=
=LEjA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
