Your message dated Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:41:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304294: teTeX 3.0 (experimental) - installation of
additional fonts not working
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2005 06:45:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 23:45:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nickel.webpack.hosteurope.de [217.115.142.116]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLF9N-0006LL-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:45:29 -0700
Received: by nickel.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.34 using asmtp
from xdsl-81-173-180-140.netcologne.de ([81.173.180.140])
id 1DLF9C-0006bu-Ou; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:45:18 +0200
From: Tobias Hilbricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Linopus Satz und Grafik
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: teTeX 3.0 (experimental) - installation of additional fonts not working
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:45:55 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-0.4
Trying to install additional fonts into the tetex-system according to the
manual given in /usr/share/doc/tetex-bin/Readme.Debian.gz does not work
because the map files are not distributed properly:
- new fonts under /usr/local/share/texmf/fonts
- map-files under /etc/tetex/map/dvips bzw. pdftex
- 10font.cfg-Dateien under /etc/tetex/updmap.d/
- texhash, update-updmap and updmap executed
result: the new fonts are listed
in /root/.texmf-var/fonts/map/dvips/updmap/psfonts_t1.map
but not in /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts.map and not in
/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/updmap/psfonts.map
updmap echoes at the end of its run
updmap: Map file links:
psfonts.map -> psfonts_t1.map
pdftex.map -> pdftex_dl14.map
dvipdfm.map -> dvipdfm_dl14.map
but these links are not the the correct map files
under /root/.texmf-var/fonts/map/dvips/updmap/
Installing the map files under /root/.texmf-var/fonts/map/dvips/updmap/...
manually into /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/...
and /var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/updmap/... results in a working
installation of the new fonts.
Yours sincerely
Tobias Hilbricht
--
Dr. Tobias Hilbricht
Linopus Satz und Grafik
www.linopus.de
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304294-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 18:41:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 17 11:41:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5SrC-0004n4-00; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:41:46 -0700
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #314)
id 1E5Sqh-0000AL-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:41:15 +0200
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 17 Aug 2005
20:41:14 +0200
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:41:14 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#304294: teTeX 3.0 (experimental) - installation of additional
fonts not working
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X..
2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On 12.04.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> tags 304294 + experimental
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Tobias Hilbricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Trying to install additional fonts into the tetex-system
> > according to the manual given in
> > /usr/share/doc/tetex-bin/README.Debian.gz does not work because
> > the map files are not distributed properly:
>
> You're right, the instructions there are not up-to-date. With tetex
> 3, you have to use updmap-sys for system-wide configuration,
> instead of updmap. Otherwise, resulting files go to
> $HOME/.texmf-var, as you could see, which is a bit silly in the
> case of root. I would suggest the following text for section 3.3
> (from tetex-bin 3.0-3):
>
Has been fixed in latest experimental -> Closing.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
