Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306341: fixed in d-shlibs 0.26
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2005 21:13:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 14:13:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 0x3ef3a55b.virnxx2.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk (xayide.jones.dk)
[62.243.165.91] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQAtO-0007Bx-00; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:13:22 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xayide.jones.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969A91AB332;
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:13:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from xayide.jones.dk ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (xayide.jones.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with SMTP id 03798-09; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:13:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [192.168.102.117])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by xayide.jones.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22D61AB467;
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:13:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 249FC33C8F; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:11:50 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: d-shlibs: d-devlibdeps does not fail if library can't be found
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:11:50 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at jones.dk
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: d-shlibs
Version: 0.25
Severity: important
If d-devlibdeps is invoked with a non-existing library (like if a
library changes name or plain typos), the command does not fail. This
causes no dependencies to be generated, possibly causing FTBFS for other
dependent packages.
Please see bug#306160 for an example of situations that can be caused by
this.
I believe the script should exit non-zero in case of errors.
Regards,
- Jonas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc1-mm3+debianlogo+squashfs
Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages d-shlibs depends on:
ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii debianutils 2.13.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306341-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2005 07:26:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 21 00:26:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6k4n-0006gU-00; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:17:05 -0700
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#306341: fixed in d-shlibs 0.26
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:17:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: d-shlibs
Source-Version: 0.26
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
d-shlibs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
d-shlibs_0.26.dsc
to pool/main/d/d-shlibs/d-shlibs_0.26.dsc
d-shlibs_0.26.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/d-shlibs/d-shlibs_0.26.tar.gz
d-shlibs_0.26_all.deb
to pool/main/d/d-shlibs/d-shlibs_0.26_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated d-shlibs package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:00:02 +0900
Source: d-shlibs
Binary: d-shlibs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
d-shlibs - Debian shared library package building helper scripts
Closes: 306341
Changes:
d-shlibs (0.26) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Check for objdump -p failure status, to check for error case when library
is not where it should be. (closes: #306341)
* Standards-Version: 3.6.2
Files:
70f867d7fbf2d1d97d8e74488843551d 498 utils optional d-shlibs_0.26.dsc
18f7a744600e24a8932ca2ccb352f8c4 41442 utils optional d-shlibs_0.26.tar.gz
ac788bff4b8987e034d0688bbd6e6d52 11454 utils optional d-shlibs_0.26_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDCCo9gY5NIXPNpFURAkO9AJ9xX1Zfw9OABygrgmZKWjPtZ+0tcACgvAnS
iq2QhCuN05zHrHaxvNPkP0U=
=BVny
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
