Your message dated Tue, 11 May 2010 15:58:39 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#571575: Utility for accurate sorting of directory sizes
has caused the Debian Bug report #571575,
regarding Utility for accurate sorting of directory sizes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
571575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571575
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: moreutils
Version: 0.38
Severity: wishlist


See disussions in bug #563118 . It is obvioous and evident, that in
order to solve that bug some new utility is needed. Let's call it
"sortdu". At least it is good working title.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 
'proposed-updates'), (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages moreutils depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.10.2-2   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  perl                          5.10.1-11  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

moreutils recommends no packages.

Versions of packages moreutils suggests:
ii  libtime-duration-perl         1.06-1     Time::Duration -- rounded or exact
ii  libtimedate-perl              1.2000-1   collection of modules to manipulat

-- no debconf information

-- 
Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juhtolv
"Quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur."



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> See disussions in bug #563118 . It is obvioous and evident, that in
> order to solve that bug some new utility is needed. Let's call it
> "sortdu". At least it is good working title.

I'm rejecting the idea of adding a sortdu to moreutils. The point of
moreutils is to gather new tools in the spirit of the original unix
tools. Writing a new program because sort and du -h don't mix w/o loss
of accuracy is not in that spirit.

There's nothing really wrong with the shell pipelines shown in #563118, 
aside from them being a bit complex. That complexity could be reduced if
du had a way to format its output like this:

412 412K .

Then the pipeline becomes just 

du --format="%i %h %f" | sort -n | awk '{print $2, $3}'

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to