Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:59:53 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#585628: acl2: Broken maintainer address
has caused the Debian Bug report #585628,
regarding acl2: Broken maintainer address
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
585628: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585628
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: acl2
Severity: serious
The mail to the maintainer bounces:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[email protected]
retry timeout exceeded
------ This is a copy of the message ------
To: [email protected]
From: Archive Administrator <[email protected]>
Subject: Processing of acl2_3.6.1-2_i386.changes
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:32:55 +0000
[...]
--
bye, Joerg
graphviz (old license)
[...]
Changes
* Burn it! Burn it all!!
pgp4tmZtdmB2l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Greetings, and thanks again for following up.
Just checked on a site from University of Texas, and from
people.debian.org. Both messages received without delay. Headers
below. And obviously I've received this message quickly.
I don't dispute that you are seeing problems, just that the problem
does not lie with the mailing address nor the packages against which
you are filing bugs. Please kindly refile if you would like against
the appropriate mail admin pseudo package if you would like to pursue
this further.
Thanks for your contributions to Debian!
=============================================================================
echo test | mail -v [email protected]
X-From-Line: [email protected] Mon Jun 14 15:49:45 2010
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:33:51 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wisdom.m.enhanced.com)
by wisdom.m.enhanced.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1OOGLv-0003WA-5x
for [email protected]; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:33:51 -0400
Received: from pop3.maguirefamily.org [205.246.216.99]
by wisdom.m.enhanced.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.6)
for <[email protected]> (multi-drop); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:33:51
-0400 (EDT)
Received: from host2.eticomm.net ([127.0.0.1]) by wh2.eticomm.net with
MailEnable ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:50:09 -0400
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by wh2.eticomm.net with
MailEnable ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:50:08 -0400
Received: from joejob.cs.utexas.edu ([128.83.120.81] ident=root)
by master.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1OOGbV-0007tK-56
for [email protected]; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:49:57 +0000
Received: from elgin.cs.utexas.edu ([email protected] [128.83.120.206])
by joejob.cs.utexas.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5EKnj3G021315
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:49:45 -0500
Received: (from c...@localhost)
by elgin.cs.utexas.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o5EKnjG5012525
for [email protected]; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:49:45 -0500
X-Gnus-Mail-Source: pop:c...@localhost
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: "Camm Maguire" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:49:45 -0500
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(3) 11/17/96)
To: [email protected]
Received-SPF: neutral (wh2.eticomm.net: 70.103.162.29 is neither permitted nor
denied by domain of cs.utexas.edu)
client-ip=70.103.162.29
X-ME-Bayesian: 4.435637
X-Fetchmail-Warning: recipient address [email protected] didn't match any local
name
X-UIDL: -`d!!]i1!!cJ\!!o5+!!
X-Content-Length: 8
Lines: 4
Xref: localhost.m.enhanced.com mail.debian:14796
test
X-From-Line: [email protected] Mon Jun 14 20:53:40 2010
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:37:37 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wisdom.m.enhanced.com)
by wisdom.m.enhanced.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1OOGPZ-0003ck-Bf
for [email protected]; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:37:37 -0400
Received: from pop3.maguirefamily.org [205.246.216.99]
by wisdom.m.enhanced.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.6)
for <[email protected]> (multi-drop); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:37:37
-0400 (EDT)
Received: from host2.eticomm.net ([127.0.0.1]) by wh2.eticomm.net with
MailEnable ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:54:18 -0400
Received: from ravel.debian.org ([206.12.19.5]) by wh2.eticomm.net with
MailEnable ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:54:05 -0400
Received: from camm by ravel.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1OOGf6-0000tm-0A
for [email protected]; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:53:40 +0000
To: [email protected]
X-Gnus-Mail-Source: pop:c...@localhost
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: Camm Maguire <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:53:40 +0000
Received-SPF: none (wh2.eticomm.net: ravel.debian.org does not designate
permitted sender hosts)
X-ME-Bayesian: 4.435637
X-Fetchmail-Warning: recipient address [email protected] didn't match any local
name
X-UIDL: SCW!!,HY"!...@o!!n(L!!
X-Content-Length: 8
Lines: 4
Xref: localhost.m.enhanced.com mail.debian:14797
test
Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]> writes:
> On 12146 March 1977, Camm Maguire wrote:
> reopen 585628
> clone 585628 -1
> reassign -1 axiom
> retitle -1 axiom: Broken maintainer address
> thanks
>
>> Greetings! The maintainer address is [email protected], which forwards
>> to the address you cite below, and does so successfully, as proven by
>> the receipt of this message, headers of which are included here:
>
> Whatever is up with your address, it fails regularly. This wasnt the
> first time. And funny, it just happened again. Reopening, and also
> assigning to the other package it failed on.
>
> Whatever is up with it, it rejects mail -> serious bug. You might want
> to try working with DSA to find out whats up between your system and the
> debian.org exims, I'm not making this up.
>
>
> --8<------------------------schnipp------------------------->8---
> From: Mail Delivery System <[email protected]>
> Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:49:04 +0200
>
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
> [email protected]
> retry timeout exceeded
>
> ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
>
> Return-path: <[email protected]>
> Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
> (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
> id 1OODm8-0000R3-1A; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:48:44 +0000
> From: Archive Administrator <[email protected]>
> To: Camm Maguire <[email protected]>
> X-DAK: dak process-upload
> X-Debian: DAK
> X-Debian-Package: axiom
> Precedence: bulk
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Subject: axiom_20100301-2_mips.changes ACCEPTED
> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> Sender: Archive Administrator <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:48:44 +0000
>
>
>
>
> Accepted:
> axiom-graphics_20100301-2_mips.deb
> to main/a/axiom/axiom-graphics_20100301-2_mips.deb
> axiom-hypertex_20100301-2_mips.deb
> to main/a/axiom/axiom-hypertex_20100301-2_mips.deb
> axiom_20100301-2_mips.deb
> to main/a/axiom/axiom_20100301-2_mips.deb
> --8<------------------------schnapp------------------------->8---
>
>
>
>> X-From-Line: [email protected] Sat Jun 12 15:36:07 2010
>> Return-path: <[email protected]>
>> Envelope-to: [email protected]
>> Delivery-date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:33:29 -0400
>> Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wisdom.m.enhanced.com)
>> by wisdom.m.enhanced.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
>> (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
>> id 1ONQq1-0004qJ-8y
>> for [email protected]; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:33:29 -0400
>> Received: from pop3.maguirefamily.org [205.246.216.99]
>> by wisdom.m.enhanced.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.6)
>> for <[email protected]> (multi-drop); Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:33:29
>> -0400 (EDT)
>> Received: from host2.eticomm.net ([127.0.0.1]) by wh2.eticomm.net with
>> MailEnable ESMTP; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:48:07 -0400
>> Received: from busoni.debian.org ([140.211.15.34]) by wh2.eticomm.net with
>> MailEnable ESMTP; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:47:53 -0400
>> Received: from debbugs by busoni.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
>> (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
>> id 1ONR49-0007zg-2I; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:48:05 +0000
>> X-Loop: [email protected]
>> Subject: Bug#585628: acl2: Broken maintainer address
>> Reply-To: Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>> Resent-From: Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]>
>> Resent-To: [email protected]
>> Resent-CC: [email protected], Camm Maguire <[email protected]>
>> X-Loop: [email protected]
>> Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:48:01 +0000
>> Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>> X-Debian-PR-Message: report 585628
>> X-Debian-PR-Package: acl2
>> X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
>> X-Debian-PR-Source: acl2
>> Received: via spool by [email protected] id=B.127635031329403
>> (code B ref -1); Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:48:01 +0000
>> Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2010 13:45:13 +0000
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
>> (2008-06-10) on busoni.debian.org
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 145; neutral, 41; spammy,
>> 2. spammytokens:0.919-+--it, 0.911-+--it! hammytokens:0.000-+--H*u:Gnus,
>> 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:gnu,
>> 0.000-+--H*u:gnu
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FROMDEVELOPER,
>> HAS_PACKAGE,NODELIVERY,PGPSIGNATURE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,X_DEBBUGS_CC
>> autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
>> Received: from vir.ganneff.de ([78.46.40.15])
>> by busoni.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
>> (Exim 4.69)
>> (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
>> id 1ONR1M-0007bt-L3
>> for [email protected]; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:45:13 +0000
>> Received: from lorien.ganneff.de (unknown [172.20.10.4])
>> (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
>> (Client CN "lorien.ganneff.de", Issuer "ganneff.de" (verified OK))
>> by vir.ganneff.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF3FC38067
>> for <[email protected]>; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:36:17 +0200 (CEST)
>> Received: from gkar.ganneff.de (gkar.ganneff.de [213.146.108.162])
>> by lorien.ganneff.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73393114445C5
>> for <[email protected]>; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:36:15 +0200 (CEST)
>> From: Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]>
>> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
>> Organization: Goliath-BBS
>> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
>> X-GPG-ID: 0x7E7B8AC9
>> X-GPG-FP: DF7D EB2F DB28 FD2B A9FB FA6D 715E D6A0 7E7B 8AC9
>> X-message-flag: Formating hard disk. please wait... 10%... 20%...
>> Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:36:07 +0200
>> X-Gnus-Mail-Source: pop:c...@localhost
>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>> protocol="application/pgp-signature"
>> X-Greylist: delayed 529 seconds by postgrey-1.31 at busoni; Sat, 12 Jun 2010
>> 13:45:12 UTC
>> Delivered-To: [email protected]
>> Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <[email protected]>
>> Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:48:05 +0000
>> Received-SPF: none (wh2.eticomm.net: busoni.debian.org does not designate
>> permitted sender hosts)
>> X-ME-Bayesian: 2.326795
>> X-Fetchmail-Warning: no recipient addresses matched declared local names
>> X-UIDL: Y87!!P^##!,B:"!kLT!!
>> X-Content-Length: 1019
>> Lines: 50
>> Xref: localhost.m.enhanced.com mail.debian:14792
>>
>>
>> Take care,
>>
>> Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> Package: acl2
>>> Severity: serious
>>>
>>> The mail to the maintainer bounces:
>>>
>>> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>>>
>>> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
>>> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>>>
>>> [email protected]
>>> retry timeout exceeded
>>>
>>> ------ This is a copy of the message ------
>>>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> From: Archive Administrator <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Processing of acl2_3.6.1-2_i386.changes
>>> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:32:55 +0000
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> --
>>> bye, Joerg
>>> graphviz (old license)
>>> [...]
>>> Changes
>>> * Burn it! Burn it all!!
>
> --
> bye, Joerg
> What do we need a psychiatrist for? We know our kid is nuts.
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire [email protected]
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
--- End Message ---
