Your message dated Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:46:54 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line gnupg: ignores expiry of archive keys
has caused the Debian Bug report #497825,
regarding ignores expiry of archive keys
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
497825: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497825
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.3
Severity: important
If I update from an archive whose key recently expired and I have
not yet updated the local copy via apt-key -- the local keyring says
it's expired -- APT does not complain but just proceeds. I think it
should *at least* warn.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii debian-archive-keyring 2007.02.19-0.1 GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a
ii libc6 2.6-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.2-20070707-1 GCC support library
ii libstdc++6 4.2-20070707-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
apt recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[email protected]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This report misses the requested information for more than a year. We
are still not able to reproduce a difference in the behavior gpgv and
gpg. See this message:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497825#68
I'm closing this report. Please feel free to comment my decision and/or
reopen it, if you can provide the requested information.
Regards, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
