Your message dated Sat, 3 Jul 2010 19:15:47 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#587956: netbase: Does not cleanup bindv6only upon
upgrades
has caused the Debian Bug report #587956,
regarding netbase: Does not cleanup bindv6only upon upgrades
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
587956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: netbase
Version: 4.42
Severity: important
/etc/sysctl.d/bindv6only.conf has been removed from the package (which
is good) but it is not removed upon upgrades, so only newly installed
systems or systems upgraded from lenny after the fix will stop being
affected.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages netbase depends on:
ii initscripts 2.88dsf-10 scripts for initializing and shutt
ii lsb-base 3.2-23.1 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
Versions of packages netbase recommends:
ii ifupdown 0.6.10 high level tools to configure netw
netbase suggests no packages.
-- debconf information:
netbase/upgrade-note/etc-network-interfaces-pre-3.17-1:
netbase/upgrade-note/init.d-split-pre-3.16-1:
netbase/upgrade-note/radius-ports-pre-3.05:
netbase/upgrade-note/portmap-restart-pre-3.11-2:
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
`- […] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Jul 03, Josselin Mouette <[email protected]> wrote:
> You wanted it to behave in a buggy way, then. That doesn???t make it less
> a bug.
I stand by my position. If you still disagree, feel free to bring the
issue to the CTTE.
> These systems don???t work fine, since a number of packages don???t work
> with this setting.
The people who had problems already had plenty of time and information
to change their configuration. There is no need to change it again for
the others.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
