Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:34:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324421: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2005 02:54:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 21 19:54:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E72Rp-0003FX-00; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:54:05 -0700
Received: from localhost (c-67-162-152-220.hsd1.co.comcast.net[67.162.152.220])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP
          id <20050822025332012005q0vle>; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 02:53:33 +0000
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 20345)
        id EB326108057; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:53:31 -0600 (MDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Al Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RM: oprofile-source -- reorganized oprofile package removes the need 
for
 this source package
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:53:31 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

   In hindsight, splitting 'oprofile' and 'oprofile-source' into
   separate source packages was a bad idea.  The original idea was
   to make it easier to build the oprofile kernel module for 2.4.x
   kernels.  In reality, it requires maintaining two separate source
   streams that are really just copies of one another, introducing
   more ways to create errors and inconsistencies.  Please see bug
   #300683 for additional information (recently reassigned from
   'oprofile-source' to 'oprofile').

   The more maintainable method is to have the 'oprofile' package
   create the kernel modules from source.  That package is in
   the process of being reorganized in order to do this properly.
   Hence, the 'oprofile-source' source package is no longer needed;
   a replacement for it will be created from the 'oprofile' source
   package, along with the kernel modules for 2.4 kernels, as they
   should be.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324421-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 07:41:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 00:41:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rmurray by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E9eAO-0007g4-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:34:52 -0700
From: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.43 $ 
Subject: Bug#324421: fixed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:34:52 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

oprofile-source |    0.8.1-2 | source, alpha, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ryan Murray (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to