Your message dated Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:41:49 +0100 (WEST)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package gq has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #238711,
regarding gq: using -geometry results in a startup error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
238711: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=238711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gq
Version: 0.7.0+1.0beta1-4
Severity: minor
Tags: sid
Hi,
when starting gq with the usual X11 option '-geometry XxY+x+y',
gq exits with this error: gq: invalid option -- g
I think that gq should either honour or ignore any options instead.
Best,
--Toni++
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-686-smp
Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro
Versions of packages gq depends on:
ii libatk1.0-0 1.4.1-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglib2.0-0 2.2.3-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.2.4-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libldap2 2.1.26-1 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libpango1.0-0 1.2.5-2.1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libxml2 2.6.7-1 GNOME XML library
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-5 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.4-1+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/238711 in Debian BTS
against the package gq. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/593165. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
