Your message dated Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:56:23 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package runit-services has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #351051,
regarding Outdated services in runit-services
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
351051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=351051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: runit-services
Version: 0.1.0
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I noticed, that some of the services in the package are for rather
outdated software. They seem to not have been changes since Woody.
The "exim" and "apache" services are not in use so often any more.
Instead it could include "exim4" and "apache2".
Many thanks i.A.
Nicholas Fechner
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages runit-services depends on:
ii runit 1.3.3-1 a UNIX init scheme with service su
ii socklog 2.0.2-2 system and kernel logging services
Versions of packages runit-services recommends:
ii dash 0.5.3-1 The Debian Almquist Shell
ii socklog-run 2.0.2-2 system and kernel logging services
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.4.0+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/351051 in Debian BTS
against the package runit-services. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/597608. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Luca Falavigna
--- End Message ---
