Your message dated Mon, 05 Sep 2005 04:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306372: fixed in sdate 0.2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 05:37:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 22:37:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from luonnotar.infodrom.org [195.124.48.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQIl1-0006rt-00; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:37:15 -0700
Received: by luonnotar.infodrom.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id D31D1366B7D; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:37:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: at Infodrom Oldenburg (/\##/\ Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2)
from infodrom.org by finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE
via smail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:28:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:28:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bugtracking System)
Subject: sdate: Description improvement
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: sdate
Version: current
Severity: minor
- Description: Never ending september date
+ Description: Never ending September date
September is a name and is written with a capital S.
Regards,
Joey
--
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer. -- Perl book
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306372-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 11:08:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 05 04:08:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECEjp-0003Sd-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 04:02:09 -0700
From: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#306372: fixed in sdate 0.2.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 04:02:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: sdate
Source-Version: 0.2.1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sdate, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
sdate_0.2.1.dsc
to pool/main/s/sdate/sdate_0.2.1.dsc
sdate_0.2.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/sdate/sdate_0.2.1.tar.gz
sdate_0.2.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sdate/sdate_0.2.1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sdate package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:01:45 +0200
Source: sdate
Binary: sdate
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
sdate - never ending September date
Closes: 306372
Changes:
sdate (0.2.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Capitalize September in Description and documentation (Closes: #306372,
thanks to Joey Schulze).
* Remove sharutils Build-Dep.
* Lintian: our package name is ok.
* Bump Standards-Version.
* I'm DD :-).
Files:
98c9d4e074b2d3ba8aa61ee165400ed0 531 utils optional sdate_0.2.1.dsc
41242f78a657c60637bd8667f778f175 492785 utils optional sdate_0.2.1.tar.gz
79d6e6dd605a3c47ee3b228caa1e8524 8990 utils optional sdate_0.2.1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDHCPyxa93SlhRC1oRAnZaAJ0aNZfDzvhaGNPC0k08hZsZez47wgCglwKk
/CEBN+HwKz3MYxMZPvCyiTU=
=aYqh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
