Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:37:21 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#601621: Missing dependency: libperlX.XX
has caused the Debian Bug report #601621,
regarding Missing dependency: libperlX.XX
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
601621: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601621
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wakeonlan
Version: 0.41-10
It seems that the package is missing a dependency over libperlX.XX
(libperl5.10 in current versions).
On some very light installation of debian, on routers or firewall for
example, this package is not always installed.
If it is not installed no specific output is given to the user, except
that the packet is not send.
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Nicolas Fournel Research Assistant |
| TIMA Laboratory Phone: +33 4 76 57 43 34 |
| 46 Av Felix Viallet |
| 38081 Grenoble Cedex France |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, October 31, 2010 09:49, Nicolas Fournel wrote:
> On 10/29/2010 01:03 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> This surprises me. Does perl actually work in that case? According to
>> the
>> libperl5.10 description and package contents it's something that perl
>> interpreters should depend on, not perl scripts.
> I understand your surprise. I made a few experiments on that.
> It works without, but it installed a few packages at the same time
> (through dependencies).
>
> I tried to find the one who chenged the situation, but nothing can be
> removed without removing the entire perl now ... and unfortunately I
> can't break the entire install for testings.
>
> So maybe I experienced a little unconsistent state of my package db ...
> since this machine is not updated that often ...
>
> I'm very sorry for the inconvienance.
No problem. I'll just close the bug, then.
Cheers,
Thijs
--- End Message ---
