Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:53:11 -0600
with message-id <20110123215311.GE22799@burratino>
and subject line Re: gs vertically misaligns printed output
has caused the Debian Bug report #122415,
regarding gs vertically misaligns printed output
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
122415: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=122415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gs
Version: 6.51-5
After upgrading to 6.51-5, I printed out tiger.ps.gz to test that
everything worked properly.
This image has a gray background, and uses clippath to ensure that the
background exactly matches the paper size.
However, when it printed, it came out in two pages, instead of one.
The first page is printed right to the top of the paper, and has a 9mm
gap between the bottom of the print and the bottom of the paper.
The second page has 6mm of grey background, right at the top of the
paper, and nothing else.
You can, hopefully, make out what I mean in the photo at:
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/junk/gsbug.jpg
(295287 bytes)
I've previously printed the same image under earlier versions of
ghostscript, and don't recall noticing the same effect.
ttfn/rjk
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: gs-gpl/8.15-2
Till Kamppeter wrote:
> On 01/23/2011 02:23 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>> gs -sDEVICE=stp \
>
> This bug is obsolete. The built-in Ghostscript driver "stp" does not
> exist any more in current Ghostscript. It is replaced by the
> CUPS-Raster- and IJS-based flavors of Gutenprint. So this bug can be
> closed.
Thanks, Till. Apparently Debian gs's gimp-print driver was removed
in 2005[1].
Richard, have you tested using the newer gs/gutenprint interface? I'm
closing this bug but please feel free to file a bug if it happens
again (for example by reopening this one).
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/313026
--- End Message ---
