Your message dated Sun, 06 Feb 2011 19:54:26 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Fixed in subsequent security update
has caused the Debian Bug report #584585,
regarding libisc* file conflicts with backports.org libisc50
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
584585: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584585
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libisc52
Version: 1:9.6.ESV.R1+dfsg-0+lenny1
Severity: serious

weasel@intrepid:~$ sudo apt-get install libisc52
[sudo] password for weasel:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libisc52
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
7 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/154kB of archives.
After this operation, 401kB of additional disk space will be used.
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... 0%
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
(Reading database ... 273512 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libisc52 (from .../libisc52_1%3a9.6.ESV.R1+dfsg-0+lenny1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libisc52_1%3a9.6.ESV.R1+dfsg-0+le
nny1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libisc.so.50', which is also in package libisc50
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libisc52_1%3a9.6.ESV.R1+dfsg-0+lenny1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


(on klecker libisc52 gets pulled in automatically by a dependency or
other so it actually breaks the upgrade)

Cheers,
weasel



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:9.6.ESV.R3+dfsg-0+lenny1

The package names were changed again.  dselect is confused, but
there's little we can do about that.


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to