Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:27:00 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#594219: manpages: tzfile.5 is very old, does not match 
current tzfile format on Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #594219,
regarding manpages: tzfile.5 is very old, does not match current tzfile format 
on Debian
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
594219: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594219
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: manpages
Version: 3.05-1
Severity: normal

The tzfile.5 man page is very old, from before the Version 2
format of zoneinfo files was defined. Since version 2010j
of the upstream zoneinfo files, which is the version now used
in the Debian tzdata package, the zoneinfo files are in Version 2
format. Therefore, the tzfile.5 man page is incorrect - it
does not reflect the format of the zoneinfo files on Debian
systems anymore.

Fix: please replace tzfile.5 with the version that is
included in the correct version of the tzcode tarball
from upstream. The latest upstream version is at:

ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub

But technically, we want the version that exactly corresponds
to the current version of tzcode that is used on Debian,
not the latest version from upstream.

The correct version of the tzcode tarball is probably
available in the Debian source packages somewhere,
perhaps glibc. If not, historical versions are available at:

ftp://munnari.oz.au/pub/oldtz

We currently want the one from tzcode2010j.tar.gz.

Wouldn't it make more sense for this man page to be
part of the tzdata package, so that the version of the
man page will track the file format used on Debian?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.5
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

manpages depends on no packages.

manpages recommends no packages.

Versions of packages manpages suggests:
ii  konqueror [man-b 4:3.5.9.dfsg.1-6+lenny1 KDE's advanced file manager, web b
ii  man-db [man-brow 2.5.2-4                 on-line manual pager

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.26-1

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:00:55AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Yitzchak Gale <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> The upstream man-pages package contains tzfile.5 and tzselect.8 manual
> >> pages, and I am guessing that these are shipped by Debian.
> >
> > No, only tzfile.5. Debian ships its own version of tzselect.8.
> >
> >> Checking ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub, I see that...
> >> the tzfile.5 page at elsie contains new info that isn't in the
> >> man-pages version of this page.
> >> At this stage, I am not sure whether the correct course of action for
> >> me upstream is
> >> a) Remove tzfile.5 and tzselect.8 from the man-pages
> >> b) Update the tzfile.5 page in man-pages...
> >> it requires verifying that the tzfile.5 changes correspond to current glibc
> >> reality.
> >> c) Do nothing.
[..] 
> Thanks for the input Yitz. I decided on (b), and applied the following
> patch, for man-pages-3.26.

Thanks Michael, the patch is present in Debian since 3.26-1. 

-- 
Simon Paillard


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to