Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:07:03 +0100 with message-id <1297613223.28842.59.camel@minnika> and subject line Re: Bug#547451: git-buildpackage: no way to specify different branches for pristine-tar has caused the Debian Bug report #547451, regarding git-buildpackage: no way to specify different branches for pristine-tar to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 547451: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547451 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: git-buildpackage Version: 0.4.57 Severity: wishlist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi guido, i was looking into starting to use pristine-tar in one of my projects, but as far as i understand it, the current behavior is to put all tarballs onto the same branch "pristine-tar", which is less than ideal for a repo tracking multiple releases. would it be possible to introduce a new option like --git-pristine-tar-branch which could be passed along to the various subcommands? thanks, sean - -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages git-buildpackage depends on: ii devscripts 2.10.55 scripts to make the life of a Debi ii git-core 1:1.6.4.3-1 fast, scalable, distributed revisi ii python 2.5.4-2 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-dateutil 1.4.1-3 powerful extensions to the standar ii python-support 1.0.3 automated rebuilding support for P Versions of packages git-buildpackage recommends: ii pristine-tar 1.00 regenerate pristine tarballs Versions of packages git-buildpackage suggests: pn git-load-dirs <none> (no description available) - -- no debconf information -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFKtUPyynjLPm522B0RAn15AKCKQcoR83G3mJ2N0SpwJjgBWaiargCfQ1T/ GJVI5dAgq3Co6k1QDvVDOt4= =msii -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi Guido, On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 23:58 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > d by pristine-tar and the diffs are all > uniquely named I don't really see a reason for different branches. I'm > inclined to tag this wonntfix or better close it if you agree. okay, my guess is that it's just a case of me having misunderstood how pristine-tar works then... i'll do you the favor and close it myself :) sean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
