Your message dated Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:34:01 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: bip debian package: #604652 (armhf support)
has caused the Debian Bug report #604652,
regarding bip: Please add armhf support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
604652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: bip
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The armhf port has reached a very good state (at 87%) at debian-ports.org,
and I'm now mass-filing bug reports to packages for armhf support.
Most packages just have to add armhf in the architecture field. The complete
list is in http://wiki.debian.org/ArmHardFloatTodo
The package builds fine using the attached patch.
Please consider adding armhf support. :)
Regards
Konstantinos
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
Architecture: armhf (armv7l)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.14-efikamx (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
bip-armhf.diff
Description: application/empty
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Monday 14 February 2011 21:03:48 Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> Hi !
>
> i am the sponsored maintainer of bip package.
>
> If i understand right, bip is not built on armhf because there is an
> opened bug: #604652. A patch is attached to the bug report, but the
> patch is empty.
>
> Could you indicate me what is the problem / build error ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre-Louis
My sincere apologies, it appears that I had encountered some build problems on
armhf, and I mixed up the cause. It appears that I had the same as armel
(which was fixed in #597262). The package builds fine on armhf now, I should
have rechecked the latest version, before sending the email.
Regards
Konstantinos
--- End Message ---
