Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:49:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#327459: rekall build failure
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2005 09:40:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 02:40:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.74]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EE1q8-0005lL-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 02:40:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP
id EB35C3815D; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:40:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7DADF3805D; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:40:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id A163726136; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:40:01 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:40:01 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: happy: FTBFS: configure: cannot find DocBook XSL stylesheets
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: happy
Version: 1.15-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that happy is failing to build on a few arches. During
configure I see:
checking for DocBook XSL stylesheet directory... no
configure: WARNING: cannot find DocBook XSL stylesheets, you will not be able
to build the documentation
While on others I see:
checking for DocBook XSL stylesheet directory...
/usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh
The first then fail to build because they try to use
/html/chunk.xsl instead of
/usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh/html/chunk.xsl
All the buildd logs show that they're using
docbook-xsl_1.68.1-0.1_all.deb so I have no idea what is going
on.
Kurt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 327459-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 05:50:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 22:50:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from aputeaux-153-1-59-39.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr
(namakemono.glandium.org) [82.124.13.39]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEhCy-000815-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:50:24 -0700
Received: from mh by namakemono.glandium.org with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EEhCI-0007dd-HX; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:49:42 +0200
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:49:42 +0200
From: Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#327459: rekall build failure
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-GPG-Fingerprint: A479 A824 265C B2A5 FC54 8D1E DE4B DA2C 54FD 2A58
Organization: glandium.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 1.1.15-1
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:32:47PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> FYI, the package rekall also fails to build on several architectures in
> a manner strikingly similar to the one discussed here:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=rekall
I believe this is fixed with libxslt 1.1.15. I'll try to check out
deeper to see what was happening. I think that's related to the fact
that libxslt is playing with libxml2 internals it shouldn't play with...
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
