Your message dated Wed, 9 Mar 2011 17:36:19 -0500
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line libjson-pp-perl kept as Suggests in libjson-perl
has caused the Debian Bug report #615605,
regarding libjson-perl: upgrade libjson-pp-perl from Recommends to Depends
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
615605: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615605
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libjson-perl
Version: 2.27-1
Severity: important


Due to a misunderstanding as to the intent of this package, and its
relation to JSON::PP (see libjson-pp-perl), JSON::PP was considered a
Recommends rather than a Depends.

In a discussion with David Golden, it was identified that this package
should be considered a Depends. The JSON::backportPP module was not meant
to be used in normal circumstances:

  > However, as long as libjson-perl will work (i.e. the JSON module) in
  > the absence of libjson-pp-perl, then it should be a Recommends rather
  > than a Depends.

  Will work, but was not designed to be used that way.  The
  JSON::backportPP was a stopgap to ensure that if something went wrong
  with the split of JSON::PP, that JSON would still have a pure-perl
  fallback.  It's an engineering safety, not an intended user API.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing this issue without resolving it. We have received some
additional clarification from upstream, who indicates that this is not
a bug (see below).

---

Dear David and Jonathan,

David Golden wrote:
>If you don't mind the extra work and plan to keep BackportPP forever,
>then Debian can go ahead and 'recommend' JSON::PP but not 'depend' on
>it, since JSON will continue working without it.

Yes, I'll maintain BackportPP.
I hope that things go on as you said.

Regards,
----
makamaka


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to